SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BC directions-lab

Scaffold a directions lab that shows shipped UI (Today) beside 2-3 design directions, with surface tabs, theme and animation toggles and the V1 MVP hover motion, registered in design-proposals Storybook. Use for a directions page or lab, or to explore design directions next to production.

paperclipai/paperclip Agent Skills author: paperclipai 68 files · 47 scripts body ≈ 3 864 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 35 h ago

Scaffold a directions lab that shows shipped UI (Today) beside 2-3 design directions, with surface tabs, theme and animation toggles and the V1 MVP hover…

As a process C 51/100 · Has gaps — References files that are not bundled: assets/PRECEDENT

TemplateSoftware developmentInfrastructureAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
94/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
85
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
51/100
Has gaps
References files that are not bundled: assets/PRECEDENT
Tools and files w 18
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
When it triggers w 12
20
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 59. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: assets/PRECEDENT

Process rating: all ten parameters 51/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: assets/PRECEDENT
  • 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: assets/PRECEDENT
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 13 mutating operations with no state check
  • 40Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
  • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
  • 100Steps. 19 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3864 tokens
  • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
  • low 14 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
  • low The response is described with custom markup (23 tags): a typed call is more reliable

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 289: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 15 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 19 items
  • +4Has examples (5 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (10 of 10)
  • +3All 2 scripts are documented

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 85.