SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BD release-announcement

Write a release announcement — changelog, blog post, in-app note, or social post — that leads with user impact, names the audience, and includes upgrade/migration steps without filler.

paperclipai/paperclip Agent Skills author: paperclipai MIT 1 file body ≈ 1 629 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 6 d ago

Write a release announcement — changelog, blog post, in-app note, or social post — that leads with user impact, names the audience, and includes…

As a process D 38/100 · Unfinished process — References files that are not bundled: link

GeneratorWriting and documentsMarketingtype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
90/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
76
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
38/100
Unfinished process
References files that are not bundled: link
Tools and files w 18
0
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: link
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "key"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "recommendedForRoles"
  • note edit-residue the text marks something as outdated (lines 145): check that old rules are not kept next to new ones — the full check reads the text for contradictions

Process rating: all ten parameters 38/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: link
  • 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: link
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 2 mutating operations with no state check
  • 55Failures and branches. 1 branches
  • 100Steps. 39 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1629 tokens

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 184: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 15 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 39 items
  • +4Has examples (4 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 76.