SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BD paperclip-create-agent

Create new agents in Paperclip with governance-aware hiring. Use when you need to inspect adapter configuration options, compare existing agent configs, draft a new agent prompt/config, and submit a hire request.

paperclipai/paperclip Agent Skills author: paperclipai MIT 9 files body ≈ 2 469 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 9 h ago

Create new agents in Paperclip with governance-aware hiring.

As a process D 41/100 · Unfinished process — References files that are not bundled: /approvals/<approval-id>, /agents/<agent-url-key-or-id>, /issues/<issue-identifier-or-id>

GeneratorAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
90/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
76
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
41/100
Unfinished process
References files that are not bundled: /approvals/<approval-id>, /agents/<agent-url-key-or-id>, /issues/<issue-identifier-or-id>
Tools and files w 18
0
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 9. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: /approvals/<approval-id>
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: /agents/<agent-url-key-or-id>
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: /issues/<issue-identifier-or-id>
  • note edit-residue the text marks something as outdated (lines 189, 196, 197, 205, 206): check that old rules are not kept next to new ones — the full check reads the text for contradictions

Process rating: all ten parameters 41/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: /approvals/<approval-id>, /agents/<agent-url-key-or-id>, /issues/<issue-identifier-or-id>
  • 0Tools and files. 3 referenced file(s) missing: /approvals/<approval-id>, /agents/<agent-url-key-or-id>, /issues/<issue-identifier-or-id>
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 55Failures and branches. 1 branches
  • 100Steps. 24 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2469 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 212: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 15 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 24 items
  • +4Has examples (8 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (4 of 4)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 76.