BF foundation-meeting-agenda
Produces an attendee-facing agenda that sets what will be discussed, who owns each topic, and how time will be spent. Supports ten meeting type variants (standup, planning, review, decision-making, brainstorm, 1-on-1, stakeholder-review, project-kickoff, working-session, exec-briefing). Emits a shareable summary suitable for Slack or email plus a full agenda with time-boxed topics, type tags, owners, attendee prep, and logistics.
Produces an attendee-facing agenda that sets what will be discussed, who owns each topic, and how time will be spent.
As a process F 42/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: ../../docs/reference/skill-families/meeting-skills-contract.md, ../foundation-meeting-brief/SKILL.md, ../foundation-meeting-recap/SKILL.md
How to improve
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../../docs/reference/skill-families/meeting-skills-contract.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../foundation-meeting-brief/SKILL.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../foundation-meeting-recap/SKILL.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../foundation-stakeholder-update/SKILL.md
Process rating: all ten parameters 42/100
- 0Tools and files. 4 referenced file(s) missing: ../../docs/reference/skill-families/meeting-skills-contract.md, ../foundation-meeting-brief/SKILL.md, ../foundation-meeting-recap/SKILL.md
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 4 mutating operations with no state check
- 40Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 65Failures and branches. 3 branches
- 85Steps. 62 steps, 1 vague phrases
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2459 tokens
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +4No input/output examples
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 433: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 10 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 62 items
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 2)
- +1License stated
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 73.