SKILLEMALL.ai

AF foundation-stakeholder-briefings

Turns any source artifact (spec, discovery, research, GTM plan, experiment results, retro, or raw notes) into one canonical master document plus a set of audience-tailored briefings, each re-pitched to a stakeholder lens (executive, board, engineering, UX, PMM, sales, CS, legal, data, or a custom audience). Every briefing is a traceable projection of the master, so the versions never disagree. Use when one piece of work must reach several audiences who each need a different framing, decision, and level of detail.

product-on-purpose/pm-skills Agent Skills author: product-on-purpose Apache-2.0 7 files body ≈ 1 812 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com analyzed 2 d ago

Turns any source artifact (spec, discovery, research, GTM plan, experiment results, retro, or raw notes) into one canonical master document plus a set of…

As a process F 49/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: ../foundation-stakeholder-update/SKILL.md, ../discover-stakeholder-summary/SKILL.md

ProcedureMarketingtype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
93/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
83
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
49/100
Will not run
References files that are not bundled: ../foundation-stakeholder-update/SKILL.md, ../discover-stakeholder-summary/SKILL.md
Tools and files w 18
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
When it triggers w 12
20
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 6. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../foundation-stakeholder-update/SKILL.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../discover-stakeholder-summary/SKILL.md

Process rating: all ten parameters 49/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: ../foundation-stakeholder-update/SKILL.md, ../discover-stakeholder-summary/SKILL.md
  • 0Tools and files. 2 referenced file(s) missing: ../foundation-stakeholder-update/SKILL.md, ../discover-stakeholder-summary/SKILL.md
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 5 mutating operations with no state check
  • 55Failures and branches. 1 branches
  • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
  • 100Steps. 40 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1812 tokens
  • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 518: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 8 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 40 items
  • +3Output format is stated explicitly
  • +4Has examples (0 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (3 of 4)
  • +1License stated

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 83.