SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BF utility-pm-release-conductor

Walk the guided 6-gate release runbook (G0 readiness, G1 adversarial review, G2 version bump and CHANGELOG, G2.5 commit and re-verify, G3 tag and push, G4 post-tag hygiene) via the pm-release-conductor sub-agent. Refuses gate bypasses and tags only the re-verified SHA. Use when cutting a pm-skills release.

product-on-purpose/pm-skills Agent Skills author: product-on-purpose Apache-2.0 5 files body ≈ 1 474 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 2 d ago

Walk the guided 6-gate release runbook (G0 readiness, G1 adversarial review, G2 version bump and CHANGELOG, G2.5 commit and re-verify, G3 tag and push, G4…

As a process F 35/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: ../../docs/internal/release-plans/v2.16.0/gate-test-results_2026-05-17_codex.md, ../../docs/reference/sub-agent-compatibility.md, ../../docs/internal/release-plans/v2.16.0/maintainer-gate-testing-codex.md

ProcedureAI and agentsSoftware developmenttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
89/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
73
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
35/100
Will not run
References files that are not bundled: ../../docs/internal/release-plans/v2.16.0/gate-test-results_2026-05-17_codex.md, ../../docs/reference/sub-agent-compatibility.md, ../../docs/internal/release-plans/v2.16.0/maintainer-gate-testing-codex.md
Tools and files w 18
0
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../../docs/internal/release-plans/v2.16.0/gate-test-results_2026-05-17_codex.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../../docs/reference/sub-agent-compatibility.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../../docs/internal/release-plans/v2.16.0/maintainer-gate-testing-codex.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../../agents/pm-release-conductor.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../../docs/contributing/release-runbook.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../../docs/internal/release-plans/v2.16.0/spec_pm-release-conductor.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../../agents/pm-skill-auditor.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../../agents/pm-changelog-curator.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../../docs/reference/runtime-components.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: scripts/pre-tag-validate.{sh,ps1}

Process rating: all ten parameters 35/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: ../../docs/internal/release-plans/v2.16.0/gate-test-results_2026-05-17_codex.md, ../../docs/reference/sub-agent-compatibility.md, ../../docs/internal/release-plans/v2.16.0/maintainer-gate-testing-codex.md
  • 0Tools and files. 10 referenced file(s) missing: ../../docs/internal/release-plans/v2.16.0/gate-test-results_2026-05-17_codex.md, ../../docs/reference/sub-agent-compatibility.md, ../../docs/internal/release-plans/v2.16.0/maintainer-gate-testing-codex.md
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 100Steps. 30 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1474 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +4No input/output examples
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 307: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 8 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 30 items
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (2 of 2)
  • +1License stated

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 73.