BF utility-pm-skill-auditor
Run a repo-wide cross-cutting governance audit via the pm-skill-auditor sub-agent. Aggregates the enforcing validator suite, re-derives aggregate counters, and surfaces cross-cutting issues no single validator catches, graded P0/P1/P2/P3 with a machine-readable status. Use for pre-release readiness checks or a periodic repo health audit.
Run a repo-wide cross-cutting governance audit via the pm-skill-auditor sub-agent.
As a process F 33/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: ../../docs/reference/sub-agent-compatibility.md, ../../agents/pm-skill-auditor.md, ../../docs/internal/release-plans/v2.16.0/spec_pm-skill-auditor.md
How to improve
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../../docs/reference/sub-agent-compatibility.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../../agents/pm-skill-auditor.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../../docs/internal/release-plans/v2.16.0/spec_pm-skill-auditor.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../../docs/reference/runtime-components.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: scripts/pre-tag-validate.{sh,ps1}
Process rating: all ten parameters 33/100
- 0Tools and files. 5 referenced file(s) missing: ../../docs/reference/sub-agent-compatibility.md, ../../agents/pm-skill-auditor.md, ../../docs/internal/release-plans/v2.16.0/spec_pm-skill-auditor.md
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 85Steps. 27 steps, 1 vague phrases
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1074 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +4No input/output examples
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 339: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 8 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 27 items
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (2 of 2)
- +1License stated
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 73.