SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BC test-ocas-openclaw

Regression test the OpenClaw Codex App Server plugin against a live local OpenClaw instance in Telegram or Discord. Use when the user wants an end-to-end OCAS manual test pass, wants to verify binding, `/cas_resume` or `/cas_status` flags for model/fast/yolo, approvals, plan mode, review, compact, status-card controls, split default-vs-full-access permission behavior, stop-button interrupt handling, rename, or other slash-command behavior, or wants reproducible bug notes from a live chat integration run.

pwrdrvr/openclaw-codex-app-server Agent Skills author: pwrdrvr 3 files body ≈ 3 839 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 38 min ago

Regression test the OpenClaw Codex App Server plugin against a live local OpenClaw instance in Telegram or Discord.

As a process C 51/100 · Has gaps — References files that are not bundled: .agents/skills/project-manager/SKILL.md

AnalyzerTelegramDiscordData and analyticsSoftware developmenttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
92/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
80
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
51/100
Has gaps
References files that are not bundled: .agents/skills/project-manager/SKILL.md
Tools and files w 18
0
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: .agents/skills/project-manager/SKILL.md

Process rating: all ten parameters 51/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: .agents/skills/project-manager/SKILL.md
  • 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: .agents/skills/project-manager/SKILL.md
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
  • 85Steps. 161 steps, 2 vague phrases
  • 100Failures and branches. 5 branches, has a failure section
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3839 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
  • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -228 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 509: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 9 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 161 items
  • +4Has examples (2 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 80.