SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BD upgrade-flow-design

Designing free-to-paid conversion flows for SaaS products. Trigger moments, paywall design, value demonstration, upsell vs downsell, win-back flows, churn prevention. Honest about paywall-everywhere (gates everything aggressively), free-forever-trap (no upgrade path surfaces), and value-triggered-upgrade (paywall surfaces at moments of demonstrated value) patterns. Triggers on upgrade flow, paywall, free-to-paid, freemium conversion, trial conversion, plan upgrade, subscription upgrade, win-back flow, churn prevention. Also triggers when free-to-paid conversion is low, when paywalls are blocking the wrong moments, or when upgrade flows are being scoped for the first time.

rampstackco/claude-skills Agent Skills author: rampstackco 10 files body ≈ 4 336 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 9 h ago

Designing free-to-paid conversion flows for SaaS products.

As a process D 49/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches

ProcedureAI and agentsMarketingSales and CRMtype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
93/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
82
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
49/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten
This is a copy of a skill from another catalog; the rating counts the canonical one: upgrade-flow-design (rampstackco/claude-skills)

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 10. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "catalog_summary"
    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "display_order"

    Process rating: all ten parameters 49/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 30Running it twice. 8 mutating operations with no state check
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 4336 tokens
    • 85Steps. 86 steps, 1 vague phrases
    • 100When it triggers. States when to use and when not to
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • low 13 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +4No input/output examples
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 680: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 14 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 86 items
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (9 of 9)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 82.