SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BB seo-onpage

Run a comprehensive on-page SEO audit or optimization pass covering title tags, meta descriptions, header structure, content quality, internal links, image optimization, URL hygiene, and on-page schema. Use this skill whenever the user asks to optimize a page, audit on-page SEO, fix titles or meta tags, review header structure, check internal linking, improve a single URL's search performance, or write SEO-friendly copy. Triggers on on-page SEO, page audit, title tag, meta description, H1, header structure, internal links, image alt, URL slug, page optimization, optimize this page, SEO this page. Also triggers for any single-page review where ranking, click-through, or relevance signal quality is the goal, even if the user does not say 'SEO' explicitly.

rampstackco/claude-skills Agent Skills author: rampstackco 5 files body ≈ 1 491 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 8 h ago

Run a comprehensive on-page SEO audit or optimization pass covering title tags, meta descriptions, header structure, content quality, internal links, image…

As a process B 73/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: running it twice, progress reporting

AnalyzerMarketingtype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
94/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
85
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
73/100
Nearly there
Progress reporting w 2
0
Running it twice w 4
30
Tools and files w 18
60
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten
This is a copy of a skill from another catalog; the rating counts the canonical one: seo-onpage (rampstackco/claude-skills)

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 5. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "catalog_summary"
    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "display_order"

    Process rating: all ten parameters 73/100

    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 30Running it twice. 3 mutating operations with no state check
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
    • 85Steps. 76 steps, 2 vague phrases
    • 100Failures and branches. 1 branches, has a failure section
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1491 tokens

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +4No input/output examples
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 763: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 17 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 76 items
    • +3Output format is stated explicitly
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (3 of 3)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 85.