SKILLEMALL.ai

CD composable-mach-architect

Expert guide for Composable MACH Architecture (Microservices, API-first, Cloud-native, Headless) — dynamic UI composition, federated API mesh, Backend-for-Frontend patterns, plugin/extension architectures, event-driven composition, and composable AI routing / Panduan ahli Arsitektur MACH Komposabel — komposisi UI dinamis, API mesh federasi, pola Backend-for-Frontend, arsitektur plugin/ekstensi, komposisi event-driven, dan routing AI komposabel.

roedyrustam/vibes-plug Agent Skills author: roedyrustam MIT 1 file body ≈ 3 444 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 4 h ago

Expert guide for Composable MACH Architecture (Microservices, API-first, Cloud-native, Headless) — dynamic UI composition, federated API mesh…

As a process D 48/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

IntegrationCloudflareSoftware developmenttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
C
84/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
60
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
48/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning frontmatter-yaml SKILL.md: the frontmatter is not valid YAML (YAML parse error: Unexpected scalar at node end at line 3, column 23: author: "Roedy Rustam" ^ ); fields were read line by line. The usual cause is a colon inside an unquoted value
  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 48/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 9 mutating operations with no state check
  • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, web) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 100Steps. 28 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3444 tokens
  • low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -2localhost URLs: will not work for another user
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 448: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 28 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 28 items
  • +4Has examples (7 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 60.