SKILLEMALL.ai

BD asc-ppp-pricing

Set territory-specific pricing for subscriptions and in-app purchases using current asc setup, pricing summary, price import, and price schedule commands. Use when adjusting prices by country or implementing localized PPP strategies.

The skillemall take

Promises to manage subscription and in-app purchase pricing via App Store Connect: adjust prices by country, implement localized PPP tactics. The package contains one instruction file at 4685 tokens, no scripts. Tests show no critical issues, quality at 84%, but process score only 45%. Security is solid, no lint errors. No sandbox or model testing, so actual behavior remains untested.

Works for territory-based pricing if you're already comfortable with ASC CLI and documentation. Safe to install—decent quality scores—but verify on your own data first.

rorkai/app-store-connect-cli-skills Agent Skills author: rorkai 1 file body ≈ 4 685 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 6 d ago

Set territory-specific pricing for subscriptions and in-app purchases using current asc setup, pricing summary, price import, and price schedule commands.

As a process D 45/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches

ProcedureData and analyticsWriting and documentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
94/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
84
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
45/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    • note edit-residue the text marks something as outdated (lines 28, 47, 246, 257): check that old rules are not kept next to new ones — the full check reads the text for contradictions

    Process rating: all ten parameters 45/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 30Running it twice. 17 mutating operations with no state check
    • 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, web) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 4685 tokens
    • 100Steps. 45 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 233: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 22 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 45 items
    • +4Has examples (21 code blocks)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 84.