SKILLEMALL.ai

CB agent-agent

Agent skill for agent - invoke with $agent-agent

The skillemall take

This skill lets an AI agent invoke another agent via $agent-agent—basically task delegation within the system. Single instruction file with 6270 tokens, no critical errors, safety score maxed out. Code quality sits at 71%, process score 67%—mid-range marks suggesting either bloat or unclear use cases.

No model runs, no sandbox testing. Platform support is broad: Claude, Cursor, DeepSeek, Mistral, and others covered. Worth installing if you're already running multi-agent setups and need straightforward context passing between agents without extra complexity.

ruvnet/claude-flow Agent Skills author: ruvnet MIT 1 file body ≈ 6 270 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 36 h ago

Agent skill for agent - invoke with $agent-agent

As a process B 67/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, running it twice

ProcedureAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
C
88/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
71
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
67/100
Nearly there
Progress reporting w 2
0
When it triggers w 12
20
Running it twice w 4
30
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

The same skill appears in 1 more place: RA-Skills

How to improve

  1. The SKILL.md body is over 5,000 tokens: move reference detail into references/ and load it when needed.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning body-long SKILL.md body ≈ 6270 tokens (recommended < 5000); move details to references/

Process rating: all ten parameters 67/100

  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 3 mutating operations with no state check
  • 40Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
  • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
  • 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 6270 tokens
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Steps. 60 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Description length 48: 120–800 characters recommended
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +4Structure: 45 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 60 items
  • +4Has examples (21 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 71.