SKILLEMALL.ai

BD neural-training

Neural pattern training with SONA (Self-Optimizing Neural Architecture), MoE (Mixture of Experts), and EWC++ for knowledge consolidation. Use when: pattern learning, model optimization, knowledge transfer, adaptive routing. Skip when: simple tasks, no learning required, one-off operations.

The skillemall take

Promises adaptive model training via SONA and MoE with knowledge retention through EWC++. Grade B, quality 84/100, no critical issues found. 347 tokens of code is enough for documentation but lean for actual implementation. Process score of 46 signals gaps in routing logic or consolidation mechanics.

Tailored for pattern learning and transfer learning, compatible across Claude, Gemini, DeepSeek, and others. Install if you need adaptive routing with memory of past patterns—overkill for one-off tasks.

ruvnet/claude-flow Agent Skills author: ruvnet MIT 1 file body ≈ 347 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 29 h ago

Neural pattern training with SONA (Self-Optimizing Neural Architecture), MoE (Mixture of Experts), and EWC++ for knowledge consolidation.

As a process D 46/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ProcedureInfrastructureAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
94/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
84
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
46/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

The same skill appears in 1 more place: RA-Skills

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 46/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 100Steps. 12 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 347 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 290: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 12 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 12 items
    • +4Has examples (5 code blocks)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 84.