SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

DD Verification & Quality Assurance

Comprehensive truth scoring, code quality verification, and automatic rollback system with 0.95 accuracy threshold for ensuring high-quality agent outputs and codebase reliability.

ruvnet/claude-flow Hermes author: ruvnet MIT 1 file body ≈ 4 808 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 31 h ago

Comprehensive truth scoring, code quality verification, and automatic rollback system with 0.95 accuracy threshold for ensuring high-quality agent outputs and…

As a process D 39/100 · Unfinished process — References files that are not bundled: ../../../verification/README.md, scripts/audit-tool-descriptions.mjs, scripts/audit-<name>.mjs

AnalyzerQuality controltype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Hermes Agent
JSON
Technical rating
D
77/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
95
Quality 40%
49
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
39/100
Unfinished process
References files that are not bundled: ../../../verification/README.md, scripts/audit-tool-descriptions.mjs, scripts/audit-<name>.mjs
Tools and files w 18
0
Result and completion w 14
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten
This is a copy of a skill from another catalog; the rating counts the canonical one: Verification & Quality Assurance (ruvnet/claude-flow)

What is at stake

Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.

Exfiltration medium severity

Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.

If you install

The instructions or scripts send data out: environment variables, keys, file contents, chat history. You may never notice, because the agent performs the upload as "part of the task".

For the author

If the upload is not needed for the task, remove it: catalogs flag such skills and delist them. If it is needed, name the destination explicitly, say what leaves the machine, and give the user a switch.

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
  2. For Hermes the description must be one sentence under 60 characters; move the conditions to a "When to Use" section.
  3. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 1

✓ No critical or high findings

Medium and low: 1
  • medium Exfiltration net-credential-use SKILL.md:574
    Credential used in a network call (verify the destination is the intended service)
    curl -X POST "https:/$api.datadoghq.com$api$v1$series?api_key=${DD_API_KEY}" \

Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning name-format name should be kebab-case (lowercase letters, digits, hyphens)
  • warning description-long-hermes description is 180 chars; the Hermes authoring standard requires ≤ 60 (one sentence, ending with a period)
  • warning description-no-when neither description nor a "## When to Use" section says when to use the skill
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../../../verification/README.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: scripts/audit-tool-descriptions.mjs
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: scripts/audit-<name>.mjs

Process rating: all ten parameters 39/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: ../../../verification/README.md, scripts/audit-tool-descriptions.mjs, scripts/audit-<name>.mjs
  • 0Tools and files. 3 referenced file(s) missing: ../../../verification/README.md, scripts/audit-tool-descriptions.mjs, scripts/audit-<name>.mjs
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 9 mutating operations with no state check
  • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (Verification & Quality Assurance) differs from the folder (verification-quality)
  • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
  • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
  • 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 4808 tokens
  • 100Steps. 95 steps
  • low The response is described with custom markup (3 tags): a typed call is more reliable

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 180: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 40 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 95 items
  • +4Has examples (28 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 49.