SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BC AgentDB Memory Patterns

Implement persistent memory patterns for AI agents using AgentDB. Includes session memory, long-term storage, pattern learning, and context management. Use when building stateful agents, chat systems, or intelligent assistants.

ruvnet/claude-flow Agent Skills author: ruvnet MIT 1 file body ≈ 2 101 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 30 h ago

Implement persistent memory patterns for AI agents using AgentDB.

As a process C 59/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, consistency

GeneratorAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
92/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
79
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
59/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
When it triggers w 12
20
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten
This is a copy of a skill from another catalog; the rating counts the canonical one: AgentDB Memory Patterns (ruvnet/wifi-densepose)

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    • warning name-format name should be kebab-case (lowercase letters, digits, hyphens)
    • note edit-residue the text marks something as outdated (lines 230, 232, 316): check that old rules are not kept next to new ones — the full check reads the text for contradictions

    Process rating: all ten parameters 59/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
    • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (AgentDB Memory Patterns) differs from the folder (agentdb-memory-patterns)
    • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
    • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 31 steps
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2101 tokens
    • low 14 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 227: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 31 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 31 items
    • +4Has examples (17 code blocks)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 79.