DB docs
(no description)
This document gives AI assistants the context needed to use the DaVinci Resolve MCP server effectively.
As a process B 65/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, execution cost
How to improve
- Add a description to the frontmatter: without it the skill never triggers.
- The SKILL.md body is over 5,000 tokens: move reference detail into references/ and load it when needed.
For the model run — optional
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 3
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 3
-
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenreference/evidence/roundtrip-gui-20260801.json:124High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)"name": "RT_f…rce",
quoted -
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenreference/evidence/roundtrip-headless-20260801.json:124High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)"name": "RT_f…rce",
quoted -
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenreference/resolve_scripting_api.txt:1149High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential)GetSetting and SetSetting --> {} # settingName vide…SDI is now replaced with vide…SDI and videoMonitorMatrixOv
Files scanned: 80. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- error
frontmatterSKILL.md: no YAML frontmatter block found - error
name-missingSKILL.md: frontmatter has no `name` - error
description-missingSKILL.md: no `description` — the skill can never trigger - warning
body-longSKILL.md body ≈ 38765 tokens (recommended < 5000); move details to references/ - note
edit-residuethe text marks something as outdated (lines 225, 228, 1594, 1993, 2647): check that old rules are not kept next to new ones — the full check reads the text for contradictions
Process rating: all ten parameters 65/100
- 10Execution cost. Instruction body is 38765 tokens: crowds the task out of the window
- 30When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 40Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, web, python, node) that frontmatter does not declare
- 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
- 85Steps. 275 steps, 3 vague phrases
- 100Failures and branches. 3 branches, has a failure section
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
- low 16 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
- low The response is described with custom markup (5 tags): a typed call is more reliable
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Description length 0: 120–800 characters recommended
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +4Structure: 40 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 275 items
- +4Has examples (25 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (13 of 23)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 0.