SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BF telegram

Send Telegram messages, files, and alerts via bot API; read replies; ask questions with inline buttons and wait for the answer (approve-from-phone). Supports multiple bots and named chat targets. Use when the user wants to send a Telegram message or alert, get notified on Telegram when a task finishes or needs input, ask for approval via Telegram, or wire Telegram notifications into hooks, cron jobs, or CI. Triggers: 'telegram', 'send me a telegram', 'alert me on telegram', 'ask me on telegram', 'notify me when done'.

sanjay3290/ai-skills Agent Skills author: sanjay3290 3 files · 1 script body ≈ 502 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 2 h ago

Send Telegram messages, files, and alerts via bot API; read replies; ask questions with inline buttons and wait for the answer (approve-from-phone).

As a process F 34/100 · No process to follow — weak spots: steps, result and completion, inputs and preconditions

IntegrationTelegramAI and agentsSoftware developmenttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
94/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
84
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
34/100
No process to follow
Steps w 15
0
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 34/100

    • 0Steps. Prose only: no discrete steps
    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, web) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 502 tokens

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3No numbered steps or checklist
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 523: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 4 headings
    • +4Has examples (4 code blocks)
    • +3All 1 scripts are documented

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 84.