SKILLEMALL.ai

BC spawn

Spawn full peer Codex or Claude sessions in their own panes and git worktrees — real sessions, not subagents — briefed by the lead and merged back. Not for bounded consults a subagent covers. Use when work must outlive or run beside this session, needs its own worktree, or must stay user-steerable.

scdenney/open-science-skills Agent Skills author: scdenney NOASSERTION 2 files body ≈ 3 757 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 5 d ago

Spawn full peer Codex or Claude sessions in their own panes and git worktrees — real sessions, not subagents — briefed by the lead and merged back.

As a process C 54/100 · Has gaps — References files that are not bundled: ../../RECOMMENDED.md

ProcedureSoftware developmentAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
93/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
82
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
54/100
Has gaps
References files that are not bundled: ../../RECOMMENDED.md
Tools and files w 18
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Running it twice w 4
30
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../../RECOMMENDED.md

Process rating: all ten parameters 54/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: ../../RECOMMENDED.md
  • 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: ../../RECOMMENDED.md
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 30Running it twice. 32 mutating operations with no state check
  • 40Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 100Steps. 27 steps
  • 100Failures and branches. 2 branches, has a failure section
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3757 tokens
  • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
  • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
  • high The skill tells the model to perform an irreversible action with no human approval
  • low The response is described with custom markup (24 tags): a typed call is more reliable

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
  • +3Description length 299: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 11 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 27 items
  • +4Has examples (5 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 82.