SKILLEMALL.ai

BC topic-modeling

Specifies and diagnoses structural topic models for survey and experimental text — choosing among STM, LDA, and BERTopic, preprocessing decisions and their consequences, prevalence and content formulas with spectral initialization and a recorded seed, selecting the topic count across semantic coherence, exclusivity and FREX, held-out likelihood, and residuals rather than one metric, interpretation and validation against representative documents, robustness checks, and DA-RT-compliant reporting. Use when the user has open-ended responses or another corpus and asks what topics are in it, asks how many topics to use, asks about STM, searchK, coherence, or FREX, or wants topic prevalence compared across treatment arms or countries. Coding against a fixed codebook goes to text-classification.

scdenney/open-science-skills Agent Skills author: scdenney NOASSERTION 2 files body ≈ 3 645 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 4 d ago

Specifies and diagnoses structural topic models for survey and experimental text — choosing among STM, LDA, and BERTopic, preprocessing decisions and their…

As a process C 59/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches

AnalyzerData and analyticsSoftware developmenttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
94/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
84
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
59/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 59/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 48 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3645 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 798: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 11 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 48 items
    • +4Has examples (1 code blocks)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 84.