SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AB html-draft

Use when user wants a standalone HTML diagram in flat engineering blueprint style — architecture diagrams, system flows, technical spec sheets, component maps. Generates one HTML file using Tailwind v4 (browser CDN) for layout and D3 v7 (CDN) for SVG diagrams. User-invoked only — do NOT auto-trigger. Triggers on "/html-draft", "сделай blueprint", "технический чертёж", "архитектурная схема", "инженерная схема", "blueprint diagram", "engineering blueprint", "technical spec sheet", "architecture diagram", "system flow diagram".

serejaris/personal-corp-os Agent Skills author: serejaris MIT 3 files body ≈ 2 744 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 6 d ago

Generates one HTML file using Tailwind v4 (browser CDN) for layout and D3 v7 (CDN) for SVG diagrams.

As a process B 65/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: inputs and preconditions, running it twice, progress reporting

GeneratorDesignSoftware developmenttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
97/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
92
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
65/100
Nearly there
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
Running it twice w 4
30
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 65/100

    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 30Running it twice. 2 mutating operations with no state check
    • 55Failures and branches. 1 branches
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (node) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
    • 85Steps. 45 steps, 1 vague phrases
    • 100When it triggers. States when to use and when not to
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2744 tokens
    • low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
    • low The response is described with custom markup (3 tags): a typed call is more reliable

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +5Description quotes 10 example trigger phrases
    • +3Description length 530: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 26 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 45 items
    • +3Output format is stated explicitly
    • +4Has examples (7 code blocks)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 92.