SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BB pm-user-stories

Разбивает Epic или крупное требование на независимые User Stories с acceptance criteria в формате Given-When-Then, проверкой по INVEST и оценкой Story Points (Fibonacci или T-shirt). На выходе — Story Map с предложением по Sprint-планированию. User-invoked only — do NOT auto-trigger. Triggers on /pm-user-stories, "разбей на user stories", "разбить эпик", "story map", "AC", "acceptance criteria", "break down into user stories", "split this epic", "write user stories".

serejaris/personal-corp-os Agent Skills author: serejaris MIT 3 files body ≈ 1 597 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 6 d ago

Разбивает Epic или крупное требование на независимые User Stories с acceptance criteria в формате Given-When-Then, проверкой по INVEST и оценкой Story Points…

As a process B 67/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: result and completion, running it twice, progress reporting

GeneratorOperations and projectstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
94/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
84
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
67/100
Nearly there
Result and completion w 14
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
Running it twice w 4
30
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 67/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 30Running it twice. 5 mutating operations with no state check
    • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
    • 85Steps. 24 steps, 1 vague phrases
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1597 tokens

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • -5TODO / placeholder text left in the skill
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +5Description quotes 7 example trigger phrases
    • +3Description length 471: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 10 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 24 items
    • +4Has examples (2 code blocks)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 84.