SKILLEMALL.ai

AB tg-bot-ops

Use when operating, debugging, deploying, or monitoring a Telegram bot or Telegram-to-agent gateway. Triggers on "telegram bot down", "bot not responding", "debug bot", "check webhook", "polling vs webhook", "restart bot", "deploy bot", "bot logs", "agent gateway", "Telegram Bot API error", "send test message", "бот не отвечает", "проверь бота", "логи бота", "перезапусти бота". Covers health checks, logs, webhook/polling diagnostics, environment validation, safe restart/deploy checklists, Bot API smoke tests, forum topic delivery, privacy mode, gateway routing, and incident notes.

serejaris/personal-corp-os Agent Skills author: serejaris MIT 4 files body ≈ 1 428 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 6 d ago

Triggers on "telegram bot down", "bot not responding", "debug bot", "check webhook", "polling vs webhook", "restart bot", "deploy bot", "bot logs", "agent…

As a process B 65/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: inputs and preconditions, running it twice

IntegrationTelegramInfrastructureAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
98/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
99
Quality 40%
96
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
65/100
Nearly there
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Running it twice w 4
30
Failures and branches w 10
50
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 1

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Medium and low: 1
    • low Exfiltration exfil-webhook-url SKILL.md:84
      Webhook / callback URL commonly used for exfiltration (verify the destination) (the skill's own vendor host; quoted — discussed, not commanded)
      with urllib.request.urlopen(f"https://api.telegram.org/bot{token}/{method}") as response:
      vendor-hostquoted

    Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 65/100

    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 30Running it twice. 9 mutating operations with no state check
    • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 100Steps. 43 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1428 tokens
    • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
    • low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
    • low The response is described with custom markup (5 tags): a typed call is more reliable

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +5Description quotes 15 example trigger phrases
    • +3Description length 587: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 11 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 43 items
    • +3Output format is stated explicitly
    • +4Has examples (2 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 96.