SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BD planning

Use when a completed department retro should become accepted outcomes and a full living ISO-week plan, or the user asks "планирование", "план недели", or "что делаем на следующей неделе".

serejaris/personal-corp-os Claude Code author: serejaris MIT 1 file body ≈ 1 719 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 6 d ago

Use when a completed department retro should become accepted outcomes and a full living ISO-week plan, or the user asks "планирование", "план недели", or "что…

As a process D 41/100 · Unfinished process — References files that are not bundled: scripts/living_week.py

ProcedureGitHubWriting and documentsData and analyticstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
94/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
85
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
41/100
Unfinished process
References files that are not bundled: scripts/living_week.py
Tools and files w 18
0
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: scripts/living_week.py

Process rating: all ten parameters 41/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: scripts/living_week.py
  • 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: scripts/living_week.py
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 4 mutating operations with no state check
  • 65Failures and branches. 3 branches
  • 100Steps. 41 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1719 tokens
  • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +5Description quotes 3 example trigger phrases
  • +3Description length 187: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 9 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 41 items
  • +4Has examples (3 code blocks)
  • +2Bilingual instructions (RU + EN)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 85.