SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BC clarify-docs

TRIGGER when: asked to clarify or improve the explanation in existing local human documentation or a PR-description draft, including a PR URL or pasted body. Grounds edits in requirements and source while preserving technical meaning. Not for code, config, generic response brevity, or agent instructions. Explicit instruction or SKILL.md targets receive a /kk:implement suggestion without edits or automatic handoff.

serpro69/claude-toolbox Agent Skills author: serpro69 NOASSERTION 2 files body ≈ 792 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 3 d ago

TRIGGER when: asked to clarify or improve the explanation in existing local human documentation or a PR-description draft, including a PR URL or pasted body.

As a process C 63/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, failures and branches, consistency

ProcedureAI and agentsWriting and documentsSoftware developmenttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
94/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
84
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
63/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

The same skill appears in 3 more places: claude-toolbox, claude-toolbox, claude-toolbox

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 63/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 30Running it twice. 3 mutating operations with no state check
    • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (clarify-docs) differs from the folder (instructions)
    • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 8 steps
    • 100When it triggers. States when to use and when not to
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 792 tokens

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +4No input/output examples
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
    • +3Description length 417: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 3 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 8 items

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 84.