BB data-privacy-controls
Data privacy control register: data category, lawful basis, retention period, access roles, encryption and consent requirement per module. Use for GDPR compliance.
The skill promises a data privacy control register with categories, lawful bases, retention periods, access roles, and encryption requirements—GDPR-ready. Single file, 3258 tokens, no critical errors, lint passes. Quality score 79 shows decent structure, but process score 66 hints at gaps in execution logic. Never run on models, no sandbox testing—so actual performance stays unknown.
For a company documenting data handling in formal terms, the skill works as a template and checklist. For automating GDPR audits or generating compliance reports—not enough. Install if you need a paper registry; skip it if you expect a working tool.
Data privacy control register: data category, lawful basis, retention period, access roles, encryption and consent requirement per module.
As a process B 66/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, running it twice
The same skill appears in 2 more places: agentic-awesome-skills, agentic-awesome-skills
How to improve
- For Hermes the description must be one sentence under 60 characters; move the conditions to a "When to Use" section.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-long-hermesdescription is 163 chars; the Hermes authoring standard requires ≤ 60 (one sentence, ending with a period) - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "risk" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "source" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "source_type" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "date_added" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "tools" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "source_repo"
Process rating: all ten parameters 66/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 30Running it twice. 3 mutating operations with no state check
- 60Failures and branches. 2 branches
- 100Tools and files. Tools declared in frontmatter
- 100Steps. 38 steps
- 100When it triggers. States when to use and when not to
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3263 tokens
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
- low 13 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
- +3Description length 163: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 19 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 38 items
- +4Has examples (9 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 79.