AD edr-bypass-re
Reverse engineer EDR internals (user-mode hook tables, ETW, AMSI) and study bypass techniques such as direct syscalls, Hell's Gate, and call-stack spoofing. Lab-only red-team research.
Reverse engineer EDR internals (user-mode hook tables, ETW, AMSI) and study bypass techniques such as direct syscalls, Hell's Gate, and call-stack spoofing.
As a process D 47/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches
The same skill appears in 2 more places: agentic-awesome-skills, agentic-awesome-skills
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 4
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 4
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securityreferences/telemetry-blinding.md:346Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)然后按 `attack-chain/` 的 initial access 与 lateral movement 章节进入下一阶段。
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securitySKILL.md:51Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use) (documentation table row)| 内网横向 / AD 攻击 | `pentest-tools/network-attack-defense.md` |
table -
low Dangerous commands
cmd-execpolicy-bypassSKILL.md:200Runs PowerShell with execution policy bypassed (documentation of a security skill)powershell -NoProfile -ExecutionPolicy Bypass -File "<SKILL_ROOT>\skills\scripts\boot…ps1" -Capability @('pe-sieve','sysw…rs3','sysmon') -StartServicessecurity skill -
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securitySKILL.md:212Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)- `pentest-tools/network-attack-defense.md` — 内网横向时如何与本 skill 联动
quoted
Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "risk" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "source" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "source_repo" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "source_type" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "date_added" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "license_source"
Process rating: all ten parameters 47/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
- 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, git) that frontmatter does not declare
- 100Steps. 41 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1729 tokens
- low 11 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 184: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 22 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 41 items
- +4Has examples (7 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (3 of 3)
- +1License stated
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 86.