SKILLEMALL.ai

AD mailtrap-managing-contacts

Manage Mailtrap contacts, lists, segments, custom fields, imports, CRM syncs, and campaign audiences through the UI or API.

sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills Agent Skills author: sickn33 MIT 1 file body ≈ 1 793 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com analyzed 2 d ago

Manage Mailtrap contacts, lists, segments, custom fields, imports, CRM syncs, and campaign audiences through the UI or API.

As a process D 43/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

IntegrationZapierMarketingSales and CRMData and analyticstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
92/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
99
Quality 40%
81
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
43/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

The same skill appears in 2 more places: agentic-awesome-skills, agentic-awesome-skills

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 1

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Medium and low: 1
    • low Exfiltration net-credential-use SKILL.md:31
      Credential used in a network call (verify the destination is the intended service) (the skill's own vendor host; quoted — discussed, not commanded)
      All endpoints below need `Authorization: Bearer $MAILTRAP_API_TOKEN` and an `$MAILTRAP_ACCOUNT_ID` in the path. Resolve `$MAILTRAP_ACCOUNT_ID` from `GET https://mailtrap.io/api/accounts`, and store to
      vendor-hostquoted

    Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "risk"
    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "source"
    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "date_added"

    Process rating: all ten parameters 43/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 30Running it twice. 15 mutating operations with no state check
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 100Steps. 14 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1793 tokens
    • low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 123: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 14 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 14 items
    • +4Has examples (3 code blocks)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 81.