AC mailtrap-setting-up-sending-domain
Add or verify a Mailtrap sending domain, troubleshoot DNS propagation, publish SPF/DKIM/DMARC records, and complete compliance.
Add or verify a Mailtrap sending domain, troubleshoot DNS propagation, publish SPF/DKIM/DMARC records, and complete compliance.
As a process C 51/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
The same skill appears in 2 more places: agentic-awesome-skills, agentic-awesome-skills
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 1
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 1
-
low Exfiltration
net-credential-useSKILL.md:32Credential used in a network call (verify the destination is the intended service) (the skill's own vendor host; quoted — discussed, not commanded)The Sending Domains API calls below need `Authorization: Bearer $MAILTRAP_API_TOKEN` and an `$MAILTRAP_ACCOUNT_ID` in the path. Resolve `$MAILTRAP_ACCOUNT_ID` from `GET https://mailtrap.io/api/account
vendor-hostquoted
Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "risk" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "source" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "date_added"
Process rating: all ten parameters 51/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 36 mutating operations with no state check
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web) that frontmatter does not declare
- 85Steps. 22 steps, 2 vague phrases
- 100Failures and branches. 2 branches, has a failure section
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1229 tokens
- low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 127: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 11 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 22 items
- +4Has examples (0 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 81.