SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

DB offensive-osint

Operational arsenal for authorized external red-team and bug-bounty recon.

sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills Agent Skills author: sickn33 MIT 18 files body ≈ 8 740 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 5 d ago

Operational arsenal for authorized external red-team and bug-bounty recon.

As a process B 67/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: execution cost, progress reporting

ProcedureSlackAWSTelegramGitHubSecuritytype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
D
67/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
61
Quality 40%
76
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
67/100
Nearly there
Progress reporting w 2
0
Execution cost w 6
40
When it triggers w 12
50
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

The same skill appears in 2 more places: agentic-awesome-skills, agentic-awesome-skills

What is at stake

Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.

Secrets in code medium severity

Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.

If you install

The files contain someone else's key or token. If it is live, your agent will call third-party services under a stranger's identity; if it was revoked, the skill's scripts simply fail. Such a key often arrives with the author's whole workspace, personal data included.

For the author

The key is visible to everyone who downloaded the skill and has likely been copied by catalog-scanning bots already. Revoke it now, check bills and access logs, then reissue.

How to improve

  1. The SKILL.md body is over 5,000 tokens: move reference detail into references/ and load it when needed.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 15

✓ No critical or high findings

Medium and low: 15
  • medium Secrets in code secret-private-key references/helpers-and-automation.md:142
    Private key material (detector / deny-list definition; key header without key body)
    ("RSA_PRIVKEY",          SEV_CRITICAL, "private_key", r"-----BEGIN PRIVATE KEY----- …
    detectorheader only
  • medium Secrets in code secret-private-key references/helpers-and-automation.md:143
    Private key material (detector / deny-list definition; key header without key body)
    ("EC_PRIVKEY",           SEV_CRITICAL, "private_key", r"-----BEGIN PRIVATE KEY----- …
    detectorheader only
  • medium Secrets in code secret-private-key references/helpers-and-automation.md:144
    Private key material (detector / deny-list definition; key header without key body)
    ("OPENSSH_PRIVKEY",      SEV_CRITICAL, "private_key", r"-----BEGIN PRIVATE KEY----- …
    detectorheader only
  • medium Secrets in code secret-private-key references/secret-patterns.md:38
    Private key material (key header without key body; documentation table row)
    | 25 | RSA Private Key | `-----BEGIN PRIVATE KEY----- …
    header onlytable
  • medium Secrets in code secret-private-key references/secret-patterns.md:39
    Private key material (key header without key body; documentation table row)
    | 26 | EC Private Key | `-----BEGIN PRIVATE KEY----- …
    header onlytable
  • medium Secrets in code secret-private-key references/secret-patterns.md:40
    Private key material (key header without key body; documentation table row)
    | 27 | OpenSSH Private Key | `-----BEGIN PRIVATE KEY----- …
    header onlytable
  • low Exfiltration net-credential-use references/identity-fabric.md:215
    Credential used in a network call (verify the destination is the intended service) (destination host is a configured variable; documentation of a security skill)
    curl -sS -m 10 -I "https://${STEM}-my.sharepoint.com/personal/${USER_TOKEN}/Documents/" -w '%{http_code}\n'
    variable hostsecurity skill
  • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security references/probes-and-wordlists.md:812
    Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use) (detector / deny-list definition)
    | **VMware ESXi** | `/sdk`, `/ui/`, `/folder` | CVE-…974 (heap overflow → ESXiArgs ransomware, KEV). |
    detector
  • low Secrets in code secret-password-literal references/secret-validators.md:69
    Hard-coded password / key literal (may be an example) (placeholder value)
    x-api-key: sk-a…...
    placeholder
  • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security references/specialized-osint.md:18
    Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use) (test fixture / example file)
    ### 29.1 Malware Analysis & Sandboxes
    fixture
  • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security SKILL.md:19
    Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)
    - external red team
  • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security SKILL.md:20
    Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)
    - red team external
  • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security SKILL.md:23
    Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)
    - bug bounty recon
  • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security SKILL.md:24
    Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)
    - bug bounty
  • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security SKILL.md:144
    Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)
    - bug bounty reference

Files scanned: 18. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning body-long SKILL.md body ≈ 8740 tokens (recommended < 5000); move details to references/
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "risk"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "source"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "source_repo"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "source_type"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "date_added"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "license_source"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "sources"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "triggers"
  • note edit-residue the text marks something as outdated (lines 260, 264, 272, 273): check that old rules are not kept next to new ones — the full check reads the text for contradictions

Process rating: all ten parameters 67/100

  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 40Execution cost. Instruction body is 8740 tokens: crowds the task out of the window
  • 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, web) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 60Steps. 81 steps, 5 vague phrases
  • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
  • 100Result and completion. Output format and completion criterion are stated
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
  • low 18 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
  • low The response is described with custom markup (4 tags): a typed call is more reliable

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Description length 74: 120–800 characters recommended
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +4Structure: 20 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 81 items
  • +3Output format is stated explicitly
  • +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (15 of 15)
  • +1License stated

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 76.