CC startup-it-troubleshooting
Practical IT troubleshooting playbooks for small teams without dedicated IT staff.
Practical IT troubleshooting playbooks for small teams without dedicated IT staff.
As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
The same skill appears in 2 more places: agentic-awesome-skills, agentic-awesome-skills
How to improve
For the model run — optional
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 4
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 4
-
low Exfiltration
net-credential-useSKILL.md:53Credential used in a network call (verify the destination is the intended service) (destination host is a configured variable)curl -X POST -H "Authorization: SSWS $OKTA_API_TOKEN" "https://$OKTA_DOMAIN/api/v1/users/$OKTA_USER_ID/lifecycle/unlock"
variable host -
low Exfiltration
net-credential-useSKILL.md:54Credential used in a network call (verify the destination is the intended service) (destination host is a configured variable)curl -X POST -H "Authorization: SSWS $OKTA_API_TOKEN" "https://$OKTA_DOMAIN/api/v1/users/$OKTA_USER_ID/lifecycle/reset_password?sendEmail=true"
variable host -
low Exfiltration
net-credential-useSKILL.md:55Credential used in a network call (verify the destination is the intended service) (destination host is a configured variable)curl -X POST -H "Authorization: SSWS $OKTA_API_TOKEN" "https://$OKTA_DOMAIN/api/v1/users/$OKTA_USER_ID/lifecycle/reset_factors"
variable host -
low Exfiltration
net-credential-useSKILL.md:56Credential used in a network call (verify the destination is the intended service) (destination host is a configured variable)curl -X DELETE -H "Authorization: SSWS $OKTA_API_TOKEN" "https://$OKTA_DOMAIN/api/v1/users/$OKTA_USER_ID/sessions"
variable host
Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "risk" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "source" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "source_repo" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "source_type" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "date_added" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "license_source"
Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 8 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3653 tokens
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
- low 15 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Description length 82: 120–800 characters recommended
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +2Single-language instructions
- +4Structure: 32 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 8 items
- +4Has examples (29 code blocks)
- +1License stated
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 79.