SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BC hunt-lfi

Hunt Local File Inclusion (LFI), Remote File Inclusion (RFI), and Path Traversal

sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills Agent Skills author: sickn33 MIT 1 file body ≈ 4 573 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 23 h ago

Hunt Local File Inclusion (LFI), Remote File Inclusion (RFI), and Path Traversal

As a process C 51/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, failures and branches

ProcedureSecuritytype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
90/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
98
Quality 40%
79
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
51/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
When it triggers w 12
20
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten
This is a copy of a skill from another catalog; the rating counts the canonical one: hunt-lfi (sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills)

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 2

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Medium and low: 2
    • low Secrets in code secret-high-entropy-token SKILL.md:152
      High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential)
      ?file=data://text/plain;base64,PD9w…Oz8+&c=id   # <?php system($_GET['c']);?>

    A further 1 matches are quotations in this security skill's documentation and are not counted as findings.

    Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "risk"
    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "source"
    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "source_repo"
    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "source_type"
    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "date_added"
    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "license_source"
    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "sources"
    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "report_count"
    • note edit-residue the text marks something as outdated (lines 97, 145, 231): check that old rules are not kept next to new ones — the full check reads the text for contradictions

    Process rating: all ten parameters 51/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 30Running it twice. 3 mutating operations with no state check
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, web, python) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
    • 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 4573 tokens
    • 100Steps. 40 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
    • low 11 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
    • low The response is described with custom markup (6 tags): a typed call is more reliable

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Description length 80: 120–800 characters recommended
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +4Structure: 28 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 40 items
    • +4Has examples (13 code blocks)
    • +1License stated

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 79.