BF playwright-java
Scaffold, write, debug, and enhance enterprise-grade Playwright E2E tests in Java using Page Object Model, JUnit 5, Allure reporting, and parallel execution.
Scaffold, write, debug, and enhance enterprise-grade Playwright E2E tests in Java using Page Object Model, JUnit 5, Allure reporting, and parallel execution.
As a process F 61/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: references/config.md, references/page-objects.md, references/assertions.md
How to improve
- For Hermes the description must be one sentence under 60 characters; move the conditions to a "When to Use" section.
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 7. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-long-hermesdescription is 157 chars; the Hermes authoring standard requires ≤ 60 (one sentence, ending with a period) - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/config.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/page-objects.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/assertions.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/fixtures.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: templates/BaseTest.java - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: templates/BasePage.java - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "risk" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "source" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "date_added" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "tools" - note
edit-residuethe text marks something as outdated (lines 371): check that old rules are not kept next to new ones — the full check reads the text for contradictions
Process rating: all ten parameters 61/100
- 0Tools and files. 6 referenced file(s) missing: references/config.md, references/page-objects.md, references/assertions.md
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 30Running it twice. 3 mutating operations with no state check
- 40Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
- 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
- 100Steps. 33 steps
- 100When it triggers. States when to use and when not to
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3325 tokens
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -212 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 157: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 19 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 33 items
- +4Has examples (9 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 61.