AC threat-intelligence
Authorized OSINT and cyber threat intelligence: enriching IOCs, campaigns, impersonation, scams, and threat-actor profiles from public sources with defined boundaries.
Authorized OSINT and cyber threat intelligence: enriching IOCs, campaigns, impersonation, scams, and threat-actor profiles from public sources with defined…
As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 2
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 2
-
low Dangerous commands
cmd-execpolicy-bypassSKILL.md:68Runs PowerShell with execution policy bypassed (documentation of a security skill)powershell -NoProfile -ExecutionPolicy Bypass -File skills\scripts\boot…ps1 `
security skill -
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securitySKILL.md:158Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)**同级**: 资产侦察 → `pentest-tools/`
quoted
Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "risk" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "source" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "source_repo" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "source_type" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "date_added" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "license_source"
Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 32 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 952 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 167: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 15 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 32 items
- +4Has examples (5 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
- +1License stated
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 86.