AB user-thoughts
Persist user decisions and project constraints to mdbase across sessions. Trigger on /user-thoughts or /ustht, or when the user discusses architecture, tech stack, rules, UI/UX, or project memory.
Persist user decisions and project constraints to mdbase across sessions.
As a process B 66/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, running it twice
What is at stake
Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.
Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.
The skill asks for more than the task needs: broad tool access, credential environment variables, binaries. Every extra permission widens the damage from a mistake or a compromise.
Narrow allowed-tools and the variable list to the minimum; replace binaries with readable sources or scripts.
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 3
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 3
-
medium Broad scope
meta-broad-allowed-toolsSKILL.md:1Broad tool permissions pre-approved: bashallowed-tools: read write bash
-
low Concealment
en-hide-from-userreferences/safety.md:61Instruction to hide actions from the user (negated — the text forbids it)Processed raw files are retained for traceability. Dimension files should be appended or marked deprecated; do not silently delete user history.
negated -
low Concealment
en-hide-from-userSKILL.md:230Instruction to hide actions from the user (negated — the text forbids it)- Never silently delete dimension files; mark deprecated content unless the user explicitly asks for deletion.
negated
Files scanned: 24. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "source" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "source_repo" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "source_type" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "date_added" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "tools" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "risk" - note
edit-residuethe text marks something as outdated (lines 181, 209): check that old rules are not kept next to new ones — the full check reads the text for contradictions
Process rating: all ten parameters 66/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 30Running it twice. 8 mutating operations with no state check
- 55Failures and branches. 1 branches
- 100Tools and files. Tools declared in frontmatter
- 100Steps. 73 steps
- 100When it triggers. States when to use and when not to
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2336 tokens
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
- low 17 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +2Single-language instructions
- +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
- +3Description length 196: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 22 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 73 items
- +4Has examples (2 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (4 of 4)
- +3All 9 scripts are documented
- +1License stated
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 93.