SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AB siege

Verifying system resilience via load testing, contract testing, chaos engineering, and mutation testing. Use for limit verification, non-functional testing, or reliability validation.

simota/agent-skills Agent Skills author: simota 15 files body ≈ 6 014 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 2 h ago

Verifying system resilience via load testing, contract testing, chaos engineering, and mutation testing.

As a process B 68/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: when it triggers, inputs and preconditions, progress reporting

AnalyzerAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
92/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
99
Quality 40%
81
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
68/100
Nearly there
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
When it triggers w 12
20
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. The SKILL.md body is over 5,000 tokens: move reference detail into references/ and load it when needed.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 1

✓ No critical or high findings

Medium and low: 1
  • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security SKILL.md:59
    Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)
    - security-focused penetration testing or DAST: `Probe`

Files scanned: 15. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning body-long SKILL.md body ≈ 6014 tokens (recommended < 5000); move details to references/

Process rating: all ten parameters 68/100

  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 6014 tokens
  • 100Steps. 100 steps
  • 100Result and completion. Output format and completion criterion are stated
  • 100Failures and branches. 5 branches, has a failure section
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
  • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
  • low 16 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 183: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 21 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 100 items
  • +3Output format is stated explicitly
  • +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (14 of 14)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 81.