CD v2-api-conventions
The response, error, pagination, and validation contract every `/api/v2` endpoint must satisfy. Use when adding or changing a route under `apps/sim/app/api/v2/`, or when auditing one for conformance.
The response, error, pagination, and validation contract every /api/v2 endpoint must satisfy.
As a process D 39/100 · Unfinished process — References files that are not bundled: ../../../apps/sim/lib/api/contracts/v2/openapi/README.md
How to improve
- The SKILL.md body is over 5,000 tokens: move reference detail into references/ and load it when needed.
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 2
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 2
-
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenSKILL.md:55High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (detector / deny-list definition)**404 is deliberately overloaded.** A workspace the caller cannot reach answers `404 "Workspace not found"`, never 403 — a 403 would confirm the resource exists. `crea…icy` do
detector -
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenSKILL.md:63High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (detector / deny-list definition)**Which of 403 and 404 an operation documents follows from its authorization, not from whether it is a read.** `requirePermission` throws two different failures: no workspace access at all is `NoWorks
detector
Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
body-longSKILL.md body ≈ 8008 tokens (recommended < 5000); move details to references/ - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../../../apps/sim/lib/api/contracts/v2/openapi/README.md - note
edit-residuethe text marks something as outdated (lines 116): check that old rules are not kept next to new ones — the full check reads the text for contradictions
Process rating: all ten parameters 39/100
- 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: ../../../apps/sim/lib/api/contracts/v2/openapi/README.md
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 26 mutating operations with no state check
- 40Execution cost. Instruction body is 8008 tokens: crowds the task out of the window
- 100Steps. 35 steps
- 100Failures and branches. 1 branches, has a failure section
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
- low 12 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
- high The skill tells the model to perform an irreversible action with no human approval
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 199: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 14 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 35 items
- +4Has examples (3 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 68.