SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BD validate-permission-group-item

Audit an existing enterprise permission-group item end-to-end — registry entry, schemas, type, defaults, tolerant parser, admin UI, capability rule, enforcement site, and tests — proving the gate actually refuses rather than assuming it. Use when checking a key in `PERMISSION_GROUP_FIELDS` or a capability in `CAPABILITY_RULES`.

simstudioai/sim Claude Code author: simstudioai Apache-2.0 1 file body ≈ 5 774 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 11 h ago

Audit an existing enterprise permission-group item end-to-end — registry entry, schemas, type, defaults, tolerant parser, admin UI, capability rule…

As a process D 49/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

AnalyzerData and analyticstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
90/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
74
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
49/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
When it triggers w 12
20
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. The SKILL.md body is over 5,000 tokens: move reference detail into references/ and load it when needed.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning body-long SKILL.md body ≈ 5774 tokens (recommended < 5000); move details to references/

Process rating: all ten parameters 49/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 16 mutating operations with no state check
  • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 5774 tokens
  • 100Steps. 46 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 329: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 11 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 46 items
  • +4Has examples (4 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 74.