SKILLEMALL.ai

BF code-review-and-quality

Conducts multi-axis code review. Use before merging any change. Use when reviewing code written by yourself, another agent, or a human. Use when you need to assess code quality across multiple dimensions before it enters the main branch.

skytiger6724/qwen-skills Agent Skills author: skytiger6724 1 file body ≈ 3 485 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com analyzed 2 d ago

Conducts multi-axis code review.

As a process F 33/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: references/security-checklist.md, references/performance-checklist.md

AnalyzerSoftware developmenttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
89/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
99
Quality 40%
75
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
33/100
Will not run
References files that are not bundled: references/security-checklist.md, references/performance-checklist.md
Tools and files w 18
0
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 1

✓ No critical or high findings

Medium and low: 1
  • low Concealment en-hide-from-user SKILL.md:215
    Instruction to hide actions from the user (negated — the text forbids it)
    Don't leave dead code lying around — it confuses future readers and agents. But don't silently delete things you're not sure about. When in doubt, ask.
    negated

Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: references/security-checklist.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: references/performance-checklist.md
  • note edit-residue the text marks something as outdated (lines 217): check that old rules are not kept next to new ones — the full check reads the text for contradictions

Process rating: all ten parameters 33/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: references/security-checklist.md, references/performance-checklist.md
  • 0Tools and files. 2 referenced file(s) missing: references/security-checklist.md, references/performance-checklist.md
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 10 mutating operations with no state check
  • 100Steps. 73 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3485 tokens
  • low 17 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 237: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 28 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 73 items
  • +4Has examples (9 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 75.