FC workthreads
SpecStory Workthreads - a weekly work-thread rollup across a team's repos from SpecStory coding histories (any agent - Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Gemini, and more). It groups the window's sessions into threads of work per project and labels each new / open / recently closed, so a lead sees what shipped, what is still an open loop, and what was just started. Use when someone asks "what happened this week", "what is still open", "what did the team finish", "give me the weekly rollup", or wants a status report over a .specstory/history corpus.
SpecStory Workthreads - a weekly work-thread rollup across a team's repos from SpecStory coding histories (any agent - Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Gemini, and…
As a process C 61/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
What is at stake
The skill contains fragments that, in the wrong hands, cost money or data. Below: what the installer risks and what the author should do.
The files contain someone else's key or token. If it is live, your agent will call third-party services under a stranger's identity; if it was revoked, the skill's scripts simply fail. Such a key often arrives with the author's whole workspace, personal data included.
The key is visible to everyone who downloaded the skill and has likely been copied by catalog-scanning bots already. Revoke it now, check bills and access logs, then reissue.
Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.
The skill asks for more than the task needs: broad tool access, credential environment variables, binaries. Every extra permission widens the damage from a mistake or a compromise.
Narrow allowed-tools and the variable list to the minimum; replace binaries with readable sources or scripts.
How to improve
- Remove the critical guard findings (secrets, dangerous commands, hidden instructions): while they stand the skill is blocked and cannot grade above F.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 8
-
critical Secrets in code
secret-github-tokenscripts/lib/patterns.mjs:187GitHub token// ghp_…B4a GitHub token (ghp_/gho_/ghu_/ghs_/ghr_)
Medium and low: 7
-
medium Broad scope
meta-broad-allowed-toolsSKILL.md:1Broad tool permissions pre-approved: Bashallowed-tools: Bash Read Write AskUserQuestion
-
low Secrets in code
secret-aws-keyscripts/lib/patterns.mjs:186AWS access key ID (placeholder value)// AKIA…PLE AWS access key id
placeholder -
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenscripts/lib/patterns.mjs:187High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential)// ghp_…B4a GitHub token (ghp_/gho_/ghu_/ghs_/ghr_)
-
low Secrets in code
secret-slack-tokenscripts/lib/patterns.mjs:189Slack token (placeholder value)// xoxb…hij Slack token
placeholder -
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenscripts/lib/patterns.mjs:191High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (placeholder value)// AIza…stu Google API key
placeholder -
low Secrets in code
secret-google-keyscripts/lib/patterns.mjs:191Google API key (placeholder value)// AIza…stu Google API key
placeholder -
low Secrets in code
secret-password-literalscripts/lib/patterns.mjs:194Hard-coded password / key literal (may be an example)// API_KEY=hunt…er2 / "token": "abc12345" assignment with a secret-named key
Files scanned: 18. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 61/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
- 100Tools and files. Tools declared in frontmatter
- 100Steps. 17 steps
- 100Failures and branches. 1 branches, has a failure section
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1061 tokens
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -41 reference files, but SKILL.md never points to them: the model will not open them
- +2Single-language instructions
- +5Description quotes 4 example trigger phrases
- +3Description length 547: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 5 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 17 items
- +4Has examples (3 code blocks)
- +3All 1 scripts are documented
- +1License stated
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 89.