SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BC defi

DeFi protocol interactions. Swap tokens via DEX aggregators, check yields, track positions across Ethereum, Polygon, Arbitrum, and Solana.

sundial-org/awesome-openclaw-skills Agent Skills author: sundial-org 1 file body ≈ 1 616 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 2 d ago

DeFi protocol interactions.

As a process C 56/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

Integrationtype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
86/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
95
Quality 40%
72
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
56/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 5

✓ No critical or high findings

Medium and low: 5
  • low Secrets in code secret-high-entropy-token SKILL.md:17
    High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (documentation table row)
    | EVM (ETH/ARB/POLY) | 1inch | 0.3% | `0x89…b45` |
    table
  • low Secrets in code secret-high-entropy-token SKILL.md:18
    High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (documentation table row)
    | Solana | Jupiter | 0.2% | `8KDD…bNN` |
    table
  • low Secrets in code secret-high-entropy-token SKILL.md:64
    High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)
    REFERRER="0x89…b45"
    quoted
  • low Secrets in code secret-high-entropy-token SKILL.md:68
    High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)
    SRC="0xEe…EeE"  # ETH
    quoted
  • low Secrets in code secret-high-entropy-token SKILL.md:69
    High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)
    DST="0xA0…B48"  # USDC
    quoted

Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 56/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
  • 85Steps. 10 steps, 1 vague phrases
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1616 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
  • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
  • low 11 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 138: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 19 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 10 items
  • +4Has examples (9 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 72.