SKILLEMALL.ai

AC just-fucking-cancel

Find and cancel unwanted subscriptions by analyzing bank transactions. Detects recurring charges, calculates annual waste, and helps you cancel with direct URLs and browser automation. Use when: 'cancel subscriptions', 'audit subscriptions', 'find recurring charges', 'what am I paying for', 'save money', 'subscription cleanup', 'stop wasting money'. Supports CSV import (Apple Card, Chase, Amex, Citi, Bank of America, Capital One, Mint, Copilot) OR Plaid API for automatic transaction pull. Outputs interactive HTML audit with one-click cancel workflow. Pairs with Plaid integration for real-time transaction access without CSV exports.

sundial-org/awesome-openclaw-skills Agent Skills author: sundial-org 4 files body ≈ 758 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com analyzed 2 d ago

Find and cancel unwanted subscriptions by analyzing bank transactions.

As a process C 56/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

AnalyzerFinanceAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
93/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
83
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
56/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "attribution"

    Process rating: all ten parameters 56/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 30Running it twice. 4 mutating operations with no state check
    • 55Failures and branches. 1 branches
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 40 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 758 tokens
    • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +4No input/output examples
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 639: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 11 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 40 items
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 83.