CD limrun-ios-simulator
Drive an app running on a Limrun cloud iOS simulator: launch, tap, type, read the accessibility element tree, read app logs and simulator syslog, screenshot, record video, connect the app to local services, play a video file as the camera, set the clipboard, read and write user defaults, post notifications, and run timed action chains. Use after a build (from any builder) when the user wants to see, test, or interact with their app on a simulator, or says 'show me a screenshot', 'tap', 'run the UI test', 'record a video', 'read the logs', 'connect localhost', 'reach my local server from the simulator', 'mock the camera', 'paste into the app', 'change the language', 'simulate Face ID', or 'launch on simulator'. To build the app first, use limrun-xcode-bazel (Bazel workspaces) or limrun-xcode (xcodebuild projects).
Drive an app running on a Limrun cloud iOS simulator: launch, tap, type, read the accessibility element tree, read app logs and simulator syslog, screenshot…
As a process D 48/100 · Unfinished process — References files that are not bundled: <signed-stream-url>
How to improve
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: <signed-stream-url> - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "effort"
Process rating: all ten parameters 48/100
- 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: <signed-stream-url>
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
- 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 4970 tokens
- 85Steps. 6 steps, 1 vague phrases
- 100When it triggers. States when to use and when not to
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
- low 18 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
- high The skill tells the model to perform an irreversible action with no human approval
- low The response is described with custom markup (4 tags): a typed call is more reliable
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Description length 824: 120–800 characters recommended
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -2localhost URLs: will not work for another user
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +4Structure: 22 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 6 items
- +4Has examples (31 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 72.