SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BC schedule-with-superhuman

Find a time and put a meeting on the calendar through Superhuman — read what is already booked, check the participants' availability, propose slots, and create the event only once the user picks one. Use when the user asks what is on their calendar, when they are free, to find a time with someone, or to schedule, move, or set up a call.

superset-sh/superset Claude Code author: superset-sh NOASSERTION 1 file body ≈ 573 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 2 d ago

Find a time and put a meeting on the calendar through Superhuman — read what is already booked, check the participants' availability, propose slots, and…

As a process C 57/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches

GeneratorPersonal productivitytype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
92/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
80
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
57/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 57/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 30Running it twice. 6 mutating operations with no state check
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 100Tools and files. Tools declared in frontmatter
    • 100Steps. 4 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 573 tokens

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +4No input/output examples
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 338: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 5 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 4 items

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 80.