CC github-actions
Manage ClaudeBar's GitHub Actions CI/CD pipelines: build, test, and release workflows. Use this skill when: (1) Setting up secrets for CI/CD (certificate, API key, Sparkle key, Codecov) (2) Creating a new release — tag-based or manual workflow_dispatch (3) Triggering or explaining the build.yml, tests.yml, or release.yml workflows (4) Debugging release failures (signing, notarization, appcast) (5) Managing beta vs stable channels for Sparkle auto-updates (6) User says "release a new version", "push a tag", "set up CI secrets", "why did the release fail"
Manage ClaudeBar's GitHub Actions CI/CD pipelines: build, test, and release workflows.
As a process C 51/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
What is at stake
The skill contains fragments that, in the wrong hands, cost money or data. Below: what the installer risks and what the author should do.
The files contain someone else's key or token. If it is live, your agent will call third-party services under a stranger's identity; if it was revoked, the skill's scripts simply fail. Such a key often arrives with the author's whole workspace, personal data included.
The key is visible to everyone who downloaded the skill and has likely been copied by catalog-scanning bots already. Revoke it now, check bills and access logs, then reissue.
How to improve
- Address the high-severity findings: each costs 18 safety points. If one is a false positive, add the rule id to guard.allow in spec.yaml.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 1
-
high Secrets in code
secret-private-keyreferences/secrets-setup.md:72Private key material (key header without key body)head -1 /path/to/Auth….p8 # → -----BEGIN PRIVATE KEY----- …
header only
Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 51/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 6 mutating operations with no state check
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 9 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 919 tokens
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +5Description quotes 4 example trigger phrases
- +3Description length 559: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 7 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 9 items
- +4Has examples (2 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (2 of 2)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 93.