BD tilelang-simplification
Find, evaluate, propose, implement, or review non-obvious simplifications in TileLang. Use for broad simplification audits; dead or duplicated compiler, runtime, backend, layout, build, test, or API surface; collapsing unnecessary abstractions or pass machinery; removing stale compatibility paths; or replacing hand-rolled infrastructure. Do not use for a routine localized refactor whose desired change is already known.
Find, evaluate, propose, implement, or review non-obvious simplifications in TileLang.
As a process D 47/100 · Unfinished process — References files that are not bundled: ../tilelang-backend/SKILL.md, ../tilelang-layout/SKILL.md, ../tilelang-semantic/SKILL.md
How to improve
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../tilelang-backend/SKILL.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../tilelang-layout/SKILL.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../tilelang-semantic/SKILL.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../tilelang-tvm-ir/SKILL.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../tilelang-dev-guide/SKILL.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../tilelang-build/SKILL.md - note
edit-residuethe text marks something as outdated (lines 64, 240): check that old rules are not kept next to new ones — the full check reads the text for contradictions
Process rating: all ten parameters 47/100
- 0Tools and files. 6 referenced file(s) missing: ../tilelang-backend/SKILL.md, ../tilelang-layout/SKILL.md, ../tilelang-semantic/SKILL.md
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 30Running it twice. 7 mutating operations with no state check
- 40Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
- 100Steps. 58 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3017 tokens
- low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
- +3Description length 422: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 11 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 58 items
- +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 76.