SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AB mt5-robot-tester

Select the best MetaTrader 5 trading robots (Expert Advisors) that have not been backtested yet, by running the MT5 Strategy Tester from the command line through a 3-round pipeline. Use when the user wants to batch-test MT5 bots/EAs, screen robots across all symbols, optimize EA parameters, or move candidate bots to finalists based on profit, drawdown, positive months/years and equity-curve criteria. Runs terminal64.exe headless; Windows + MetaTrader 5 required at run time.

tradermonty/claude-trading-skills Agent Skills author: tradermonty 19 files · 12 scripts body ≈ 2 455 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 5 d ago

Select the best MetaTrader 5 trading robots (Expert Advisors) that have not been backtested yet, by running the MT5 Strategy Tester from the command line…

As a process B 73/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: running it twice

ProcedureInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
97/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
92
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
73/100
Nearly there
Running it twice w 4
30
Failures and branches w 10
50
Tools and files w 18
60
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 19. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 73/100

    • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
    • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, python) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
    • 100Steps. 39 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2455 tokens
    • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • -2localhost URLs: will not work for another user
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 478: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 20 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 39 items
    • +3Output format is stated explicitly
    • +4Has examples (4 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
    • +3All 6 scripts are documented

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 92.