SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BD trigger-chat-agent-advanced

Advanced and operational chat.agent capabilities for Trigger.dev, loaded on demand. Load this when working on the raw Sessions primitive (sessions / SessionHandle), a custom chat transport or the realtime wire protocol, durable sub-agents (AgentChat, chat.stream.writer), human-in-the-loop, steering, actions, background injection (chat.defer / chat.inject), fast starts (preload, Head Start via @trigger.dev/sdk/chat-server), context resilience (compaction, recovery boot, OOM, large payloads), chat.local run-scoped state, offline testing with mockChatAgent, or prerelease/version upgrades. For the everyday chat.agent({...}) definition and the useTriggerChatTransport happy path, use the trigger-authoring-chat-agent skill instead.

triggerdotdev/trigger.dev Agent Skills author: triggerdotdev Apache-2.0 1 file body ≈ 962 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 6 d ago

Advanced and operational chat.agent capabilities for Trigger.dev, loaded on demand. Load this when working on the raw Sessions primitive (sessions /…

As a process D 43/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

IntegrationAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
93/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
82
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
43/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

The same skill appears in 1 more place: trigger.dev

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "type"
    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "library"
    • note edit-residue the text marks something as outdated (lines 46): check that old rules are not kept next to new ones — the full check reads the text for contradictions

    Process rating: all ten parameters 43/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 30Running it twice. 5 mutating operations with no state check
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (node) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 100Steps. 11 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 962 tokens

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 734: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 3 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 11 items
    • +4Has examples (1 code blocks)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 82.