CD pr-checklist
Prepare a vLLM change for human PR review or re-review, or analyze an open pull request. Use before opening a PR, drafts included (e.g. `gh pr create`), or pushing review fixes, to check design fit, behavioral coverage, performance evidence, diff quality, and closure of previous feedback.
Prepare a vLLM change for human PR review or re-review, or analyze an open pull request.
As a process D 42/100 · Unfinished process — References files that are not bundled: ../../../docs/contributing/model/basic.md, ../../../docs/design/model_runner_v2.md, ../../../docs/design/model_runner_v2.md
How to improve
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../../../docs/contributing/model/basic.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../../../docs/design/model_runner_v2.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../../../docs/design/model_runner_v2.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../../../tests/AGENTS.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../../../docs/contributing/README.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../../../docs/features/disagg_prefill.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../../../docs/design/nixl_kv_push_connector.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../../../docs/design/nixl_kv_cache_lease.md - note
edit-residuethe text marks something as outdated (lines 89): check that old rules are not kept next to new ones — the full check reads the text for contradictions
Process rating: all ten parameters 42/100
- 0Tools and files. 8 referenced file(s) missing: ../../../docs/contributing/model/basic.md, ../../../docs/design/model_runner_v2.md, ../../../docs/design/model_runner_v2.md
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 40Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
- 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 4633 tokens
- 85Steps. 16 steps, 2 vague phrases
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 289: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 26 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 16 items
- +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 72.