SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BB ov-skills

Load when an agent needs to manage, install, update, remove, or validate OpenViking skills via the `ov skills` CLI. Trigger on explicit user requests about skill management, when the user mentions `ov skills`, `install skill`, `update skill`, `delete skill`, `validate skill`, or when an agent needs to discover what skills are available on the OpenViking server.

volcengine/OpenViking Agent Skills author: volcengine AGPL-3.0 4 files body ≈ 1 021 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 6 d ago

Load when an agent needs to manage, install, update, remove, or validate OpenViking skills via the ov skills CLI.

As a process B 66/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: failures and branches, running it twice, progress reporting

ProcedureAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
94/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
86
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
66/100
Nearly there
Failures and branches w 10
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
Running it twice w 4
30
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "last_updated"
    • note edit-residue the text marks something as outdated (lines 39): check that old rules are not kept next to new ones — the full check reads the text for contradictions

    Process rating: all ten parameters 66/100

    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 30Running it twice. 18 mutating operations with no state check
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
    • 100Steps. 25 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1021 tokens
    • low The response is described with custom markup (5 tags): a typed call is more reliable

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +4No input/output examples
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 363: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 10 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 25 items
    • +3Output format is stated explicitly
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (2 of 2)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 86.